Union Olive Oil Co. v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 78, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 626
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 7, 1949
DocketC. D. 1195
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 Cust. Ct. 78 (Union Olive Oil Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Union Olive Oil Co. v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 78, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 626 (cusc 1949).

Opinion

Cline, Judge:

This is a protest against the collector’s assessment •of duty on-merchandise described in the invoice as “black olives in brine” imported from Greece at 30 cents per gallon under paragraph 744 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as “olives in brine, ripe.” It is claimed that the merchandise is properly dutiable under said paragraph at 20 cents per gallon as “olives in brine, green.”

The pertinent provisions of the tariff act are as follows:

Par. 744. Olives: In brine, green, 20 cents per gallon; in brine, ripe, 30 cents per gallon; in brine, pitted or stuffed, 30 cents per gallon; dried ripe, 5 cents per pound; not specially provided for, 5 cents per pound.

At the trial plaintiff introduced into evidence the record'in the case of A. G. Skourtsis, Inc. v. United States, 69 Treas. Dec. 522, T. D. 48218, an official sample from the files of this court (plaintiff’s exhibit 1), and an official sample of the merchandise involved herein (plaintiff’s exhibit 2).

The testimony of the witnesses in the incorporated case was summarized by the court in its decision as follows:

The plaintiff introduced the testimony of four witnesses who were importers of food products, including olives, from Greece. The first witness testified that he had spent some time in Greece, had visited the olive plantations, had seen olives like Exhibit 1 harvested and that these olives are reddish or pinkish in color. He further stated that the olive is hard, its skin is very firm, its meat is firm and its texture sound and that it contains very little oil and has a bitter taste. He [79]*79testified that they are picked from the tree by hand, submerged in a salt solution in huge vats and allowed to remain there for a year or two, after which they are put into barrels in brine and shipped to this country; that the purpose of using the brine solution is to preserve the olives; that the salt solution does not change the texture of the olive; that they are firm; that the salt takes the bitterness out of them and makes them sweeter. He further testified that in the condition as picked from the tree the olive in bis opinion was an immature olive, that the sample (Exhibit 1) is in the same state as the olive when it was originally picked from the tree; that it did not mature. In answer to questions by the court this witness stated that these olives are picked just as they begin to turn from a green to a pinkish color; that if they were left on the tree the meat would begin to get softer and softer and the skin would wrinkle and the whole olive would become black, the meat soft and oily. On cross-examination in answer to a question he stated that as the olive begins to mature it becomes pinkish in color.
* * * [The second witness] stated that the difference between the Greek ripe olive in brine and the Greek green olive in brine is that the meat of the ripe olive is very soft, the skin is very wrinkled, the oil content is very" heavy, and “there is almost none of the water that there is in the unripe olive”, the only moisture is practically oil; that the color of the meat is different all the way through, the ripe olive being completely black through and through; that the skin is wrinkled or shriveled as compared with the unripe olive, which is “full in appearance”; that they differ in taste, the completely ripe olive being sweet and oily in taste and the unripe very bitter, and after it has been in brine for some time the brine makes the olive salty.
This witness stated that based on his experience in dealing with Greek olives he would say that the olives as represented by Exhibit 1 are unripe. It was also brought out in this witness’ testimony that from about 1908 to 1926 or 1927 he had handled ripe olives in brine, but that he had stopped importing those ripe olives because of the change in demand in the type of olive the trade wanted; that they wanted an “olive that would last longer,” that the ripe olive, in the ultimate seller’s hands, would spoil too quickly, whereas an olive like those here involved would hold up much better. * * * He stated that there is a difference in the state of maturity of olives as they grow; that as olives begin to get ripe and take on a pinkish hue, in his opinion “the change in color, * * * is not necessarily a mark of maturity”; that he did not think the color had anything to do with the question of maturity, because “there are olives that are black on the skin that are still unripe.” He was asked on cross-examination whether an olive taken from the sample of the imported merchandise (Exhibit 1) was not wrinkled, to which he replied that there were a few wrinkles. He was asked to cut the olive and state the color of the meat of the section as cut. He called the color grayish. He stated that the color of the inside of a ripe olive is black; that today, so far as he knew there is no such thing on the market as a Greek ripe olive. * * *

The court held that the common meaning of the word “ripe” when applied to fruits is “mature”,- that the olives in that case had been picked from the trees while immature; that, therefore, they were properly dutiable at 20 cents per gallon under paragraph 744 as olives in brine, green.

In the instant case the defendant introduced the testimony of five witnesses in order to prove commercial designation or to aid the court in determining the common meaning of the terms “ripe olives” and “green olives.”

[80]*80The first witness called was Joseph Margiotta, a buyer and seller of foods, especially olives, since 1923. He identified a jar of merchandise as containing California black ripe olives and the same was marked in evidence as defendant's illustrative exhibit C. The witness then stated that olives are grown in this country in California and Arizona; that they are picked on the .verge of maturity when they are a reddish-pinkish color; that they are taken to a plant where they are put in brine and then in a lye solution; aerated until they acquire the degree of color or darkness desired; then washed and put in vats for a time until they are canned.

The witness was then shown a jar of merchandise which he identified as containing a Spanish type green olive. This was marked defendant’s illustrative exhibit D. Another exhibit was identified by the witness as containing Sicilian style green olives, California produced (defendant’s illustrative exhibit E). He stated that olives used to make the latter variety are picked while still green in color before they have matured; that they are then subjected to salt solution, fermentation processes, sorted, and placed in the final brine ready for sale.

The witness then identified another sample as a can of California green ripe olives (defendant’s illustrative .exhibit F), stating that they were of an olive drab color with mottled specks. He stated further that the taste of green ripe olives is similar to that of black ripe olives, whereas the ordinary green olives taste sharper and more bitter.

The witness testified that in his commercial experience he had become familiar with the terms “ripe olives in brine” and “green olives in brine”; that those terms were well known in the olive trade, except that the term “green olives” is qualified as to type, either Spanish or Sicilian, or some other variety; that in the purchase and sale of green olives in the United States, the color of the olive is always green.

Counsel for the Government read to the witness the following quotation from Capolino & Bianco, Inc. v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moscahlades Bros. v. United States
30 Cust. Ct. 289 (U.S. Customs Court, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Cust. Ct. 78, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-olive-oil-co-v-united-states-cusc-1949.