Union Norman Bethell v. State

741 F.2d 1341
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedSeptember 18, 1984
DocketNo. 83-5727
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 741 F.2d 1341 (Union Norman Bethell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Union Norman Bethell v. State, 741 F.2d 1341 (11th Cir. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In July 1982, Bethell was arrested eight miles beyond Florida territorial boundaries by Florida agents and charged with a violation of Fla.Stat. § 370.1105(2) (1983), which prohibits the possession of fish traps and the taking of finfish with fish traps. Bet-hell filed this civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982), seeking a declaration that the statute was unconstitutional as applied outside the boundaries of the state, preliminary and permanent injunctions against its extraterritorial application, and damages. The district court granted Bet-hell summary judgment regarding the constitutionality of the statute, and issued a permanent injunction against its application outside Florida boundaries. The court reserved ruling on the issue of damages. The State appeals; we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) (1982) (allowing interlocutory appeal from an order granting an injunction).

Since the State’s appeal, the Florida Supreme Court has construed section 370.-1105(2), under which Bethell was arrested, and determined that it does not apply outside the territorial boundaries of the state. Southeastern Fisheries Association, Inc. v. Department of Natural Resources, 453 So.2d 1351 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we no longer have a live controversy before us on this issue. We thus are obliged to vacate the district court’s order granting injunc-tive relief and to remand the case for disposition of any remaining claims. See Hall v. Beals, 396 U.S. 45, 90 S.Ct. 200, 201-02, 24 L.Ed.2d 214 (1969) (vacating judgment and remanding case which had “lost its character as a present, live controversy of the kind that must exist if we are to avoid advisory opinions on abstract propositions of law.”)

VACATED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bethell v. State of Florida
741 F.2d 1341 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
741 F.2d 1341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-norman-bethell-v-state-ca11-1984.