Union National Bank v. Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Union National Bank v. Circuit Judge

1 McGrath 36

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 2, 1896

DocketNo. 15642½

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 36 (Union National Bank v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Union National Bank v. Circuit Judge, 1 McGrath 36 (Mich. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

To vacate an order dismissing garnishment proceedings for want of prosecution, it appearing that three garnishee defendants were individually proceeded against and separately answered, and in the title of the motion to dismiss the three were joined as garnishee defendants, and the motion to vacate was based upon such joinder.

Order to show cause denied June 2, 1896. See St. Sav. Bk. vs. Ct. Judge, 95 M., 100, No. 39.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To vacate an order dismissing garnishment proceedings for want of prosecution, it appearing that three garnishee defendants were individually proceeded against and separately answered, and in the title of the motion to dismiss the three were joined as garnishee defendants, and the motion to vacate was based upon such joinder.

Order to show cause denied June 2, 1896. See St. Sav. Bk. vs. Ct. Judge, 95 M., 100, No. 39.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-national-bank-v-circuit-judge-mich-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack