Union Mortgagee Corp. v. Cuomo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Union Mortgagee Corp. v. Cuomo

62 A.D.2d 1062, 404 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11151

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 62 A.D.2d 1062 (Union Mortgagee Corp. v. Cuomo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Union Mortgagee Corp. v. Cuomo, 62 A.D.2d 1062, 404 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the respondent Secretary of State, dated February 27, 1976, as, after a hearing, held that the petitioners had demonstrated incompetency (see Real Property Law, § 441-c) and suspended their real estate brokers’ licenses for one year, or in lieu thereof fined each $1,500. Determination confirmed insofar as reviewed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that petitioners had demonstrated incompetency. The other arguments raised by the petitioners are without merit. Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the respondent Secretary of State, dated February 27, 1976, as, after a hearing, held that the petitioners had demonstrated incompetency (see Real Property Law, § 441-c) and suspended their real estate brokers’ licenses for one year, or in lieu thereof fined each $1,500. Determination confirmed insofar as reviewed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that petitioners had demonstrated incompetency. The other arguments raised by the petitioners are without merit. Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.D.2d 1062, 404 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-mortgagee-corp-v-cuomo-nyappdiv-1978.