Union Labor Life Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
This text of 228 A.D.2d 244 (Union Labor Life Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Each term in the bond issued by the non-party surety, if not specifically defined in the bond, "should be given its plain, ordinary and proper meaning” (Dupack v Nationwide Leisure Corp., 73 AD2d 903, 905). So viewed, the language of the National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh bond excludes coverage of plaintiff’s loss because the loss was not on a note "executed” by a "customer” of plaintiff. Thus, that bond does not constitute "other insurance” within the meaning of defendant’s bond. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 A.D.2d 244, 643 N.Y.2d 566, 643 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-labor-life-insurance-v-fidelity-deposit-co-of-maryland-nyappdiv-1996.