Union Investment Co. v. Engesser
This text of 107 S.E. 861 (Union Investment Co. v. Engesser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A judge of the superior court is without power, prior to the appearance term of an equitable case, to render a decision therein sustaining or overruling a general demurrer to the petition. Williamson v. Anderson Cotton Co., 146 Ga. 503 (91 S. E. 553); Crovatt v. Baker, 130 Ga. 507 (2), 511 (61 S. E. 127); note to Park’s Code, § 4850. “ Parties to proceedings for equitable relief may, by consent, dispose of all equity causes at the first, term, if service has been properly perfected” (Civil Code,'§ 5421), but there is no provision of law authorizing a judge upon consent of the parties to render judgment upon a general demurrer prior to the first term; and where the parties seek to have this done, and the court enters judgment on the demurrer at such time, the judgment will be reversed. Pope v. Jones, 79 Ga. 487 (2), 488 (4 S. E. 860).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 S.E. 861, 151 Ga. 695, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-investment-co-v-engesser-ga-1921.