Union Institute & University v. Parker

Fourth Circuit

Union Institute & University v. Parker

475 F. App'x 462, 475 Fed. Appx. 462, 475 F. App’x 462, 2012 WL 3553640

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 20, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1374

StatusPublished

This text of 475 F. App'x 462 (Union Institute & University v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Union Institute & University v. Parker, 475 F. App'x 462, 475 Fed. Appx. 462, 475 F. App’x 462, 2012 WL 3553640 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Monroe Roosevelt Parker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Union Institute & University’s motion to dismiss and dismissing his appeal of a decision of the bankruptcy court denying his motion for miscellaneous relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parker v. Union Inst. & Univ., No. 1:11-cv-03248-WMN (D.Md. Mar. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Monroe Roosevelt Parker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Union Institute & University’s motion to dismiss and dismissing his appeal of a decision of the bankruptcy court denying his motion for miscellaneous relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parker v. Union Inst. & Univ., No. 1:11-cv-03248-WMN (D.Md. Mar. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

475 F. App'x 462, 475 Fed. Appx. 462, 475 F. App’x 462, 2012 WL 3553640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-institute-university-v-parker-ca4-2012.