Union Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. The Bridgeport

35 F. 224, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2447

Opinion

Blatchford, Justice.

'I concur with the district judge in his views and conclusions in his decision in these cases. In the first-entitled case let there be a decree for the libelant for $700, with interest from December 24,1883, and its costs in the district court, taxed at $71.24, and its costs in this court, to be taxed, against the steam-tug; and a decree dismissing the libel as against the steam-boat, with costs to her claimant in the district court, against the libelant, taxed at$48.03, and its costs in this court, against the libelant, to be taxed. In the second-entitled case, let there be a decree for the libelants for $469.05, with interest from October 1, 1883, and their costs in the district court, taxed at $76.13, and their costs in this court, to be taxed, against the steam-tug; and a decree dismissing the libel as against the steam-boat, with costs to her claimant, in the district court, against the libelants, taxed at $57.11, and its costs in this court, against the libelants, to be taxed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. The Bridgeport, 35 F. 224, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2447 (circtedny 1888).

35 F. 224 (Union Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. The Bridgeport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.