Union Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. The Bridgeport

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York

Union Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. The Bridgeport

35 F. 224, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2447

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 35 F. 224 (Union Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. The Bridgeport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Union Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. The Bridgeport, 35 F. 224, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2447 (circtedny 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Blatchford, Justice.

'I concur with the district judge in his views and conclusions in his decision in these cases. In the first-entitled case let there be a decree for the libelant for $700, with interest from December 24,1883, and its costs in the district court, taxed at $71.24, and its costs in this court, to be taxed, against the steam-tug; and a decree dismissing the libel as against the steam-boat, with costs to her claimant in the district court, against the libelant, taxed at$48.03, and its costs in this court, against the libelant, to be taxed. In the second-entitled case, let there be a decree for the libelants for $469.05, with interest from October 1, 1883, and their costs in the district court, taxed at $76.13, and their costs in this court, to be taxed, against the steam-tug; and a decree dismissing the libel as against the steam-boat, with costs to her claimant, in the district court, against the libelants, taxed at $57.11, and its costs in this court, against the libelants, to be taxed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blatchford, Justice.

'I concur with the district judge in his views and conclusions in his decision in these cases. In the first-entitled case let there be a decree for the libelant for $700, with interest from December 24,1883, and its costs in the district court, taxed at $71.24, and its costs in this court, to be taxed, against the steam-tug; and a decree dismissing the libel as against the steam-boat, with costs to her claimant in the district court, against the libelant, taxed at$48.03, and its costs in this court, against the libelant, to be taxed. In the second-entitled case, let there be a decree for the libelants for $469.05, with interest from October 1, 1883, and their costs in the district court, taxed at $76.13, and their costs in this court, to be taxed, against the steam-tug; and a decree dismissing the libel as against the steam-boat, with costs to her claimant, in the district court, against the libelants, taxed at $57.11, and its costs in this court, against the libelants, to be taxed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 F. 224, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-ins-co-of-philadelphia-v-the-bridgeport-circtedny-1888.