Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Manor Realty Co.

Sixth Circuit

Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Manor Realty Co.

122 F.2d 551, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3021

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 25, 1941

DocketNo. 8862

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 122 F.2d 551 (Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Manor Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Manor Realty Co., 122 F.2d 551, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3021 (6th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the oral argument of counsel and the briefs and original papers; and it appearing to the court that the District Court has jurisdiction under Section 77B, sub. i, Bankr.Act, 11 U.S.C..A. § 207, sub. i to provide for the payment of reasonable allowances and to modify an amount decreed to be paid by a state court as an allowance in case the District Court finds that the amount decreed is not reasonable (Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Colwood Co., 6 Cir., 111 F.2d 671; Butzel v. Webster Apartments Co., 6 Cir., 112 F.2d 362), and that the claimant has the burden of proving the worth of such services (Woods, Court Trustee, v. City National Bank & Trust Co., 312 U.S. 262, 61 S.Ct. 493, 85 L.Ed. 820);

And it appearing to the court that the appellant should be permitted a further opportunity to establish before the District Court the worth of its services in the state court foreclosure proceedings ;

And it appearing that the appellee agrees to such a remand:

It is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the case be, and it hereby is remanded to the District Court for a determination of the amount to be allowed to the appellant for its reasonable administrative allowance in the state court foreclosure proceeding.

It is further ordered that the appellant pay the costs of this appeal in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the oral argument of counsel and the briefs and original papers; and it appearing to the court that the District Court has jurisdiction under Section 77B, sub. i, Bankr.Act, 11 U.S.C..A. § 207, sub. i to provide for the payment of reasonable allowances and to modify an amount decreed to be paid by a state court as an allowance in case the District Court finds that the amount decreed is not reasonable (Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Colwood Co., 6 Cir., 111 F.2d 671; Butzel v. Webster Apartments Co., 6 Cir., 112 F.2d 362), and that the claimant has the burden of proving the worth of such services (Woods, Court Trustee, v. City National Bank & Trust Co., 312 U.S. 262, 61 S.Ct. 493, 85 L.Ed. 820);

And it appearing to the court that the appellant should be permitted a further opportunity to establish before the District Court the worth of its services in the state court foreclosure proceedings ;

And it appearing that the appellee agrees to such a remand:

It is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the case be, and it hereby is remanded to the District Court for a determination of the amount to be allowed to the appellant for its reasonable administrative allowance in the state court foreclosure proceeding.

It is further ordered that the appellant pay the costs of this appeal in this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 F.2d 551, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-guardian-trust-co-v-manor-realty-co-ca6-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack