Union Graded School Dist. No. 106 v. Independent Consolidated School Dist. No. 6

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Union Graded School Dist. No. 106 v. Independent Consolidated School Dist. No. 6

1933 OK 56, 18 P.2d 860, 162 Okla. 18, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 472

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 31, 1933

Docket23947

StatusPublished

This text of 1933 OK 56 (Union Graded School Dist. No. 106 v. Independent Consolidated School Dist. No. 6) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Union Graded School Dist. No. 106 v. Independent Consolidated School Dist. No. 6, 1933 OK 56, 18 P.2d 860, 162 Okla. 18, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 472 (Okla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal was lodged on the 6th day of August, 1932, from, the county .court of Harmon county, Okla., the record of appeal being made by transcript. Motion to dismiss! was filed September 29, 1932. On October 11, 1932, plaintiff in error filed, by leave of court, its brief, in which it joins the merits of the case and a response fioi the motion to dismiss.

We have carefully checked the eitatious in both the brief on the motion to dismiss and the brief submitted by the plaintiff in error, and find that the judgment of the court fairly determinéis the law, and that the argument that the county court never obtained jurisdiction of the attempted appeal is well supported. Randol v. Harbour-Longmire Co., 127 Okla. 7, 259 P. 548.

It being apparent that no good can come from further delay in this court, and that the appeal is not meritorious, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal was lodged on the 6th day of August, 1932, from, the county .court of Harmon county, Okla., the record of appeal being made by transcript. Motion to dismiss! was filed September 29, 1932. On October 11, 1932, plaintiff in error filed, by leave of court, its brief, in which it joins the merits of the case and a response fioi the motion to dismiss.

We have carefully checked the eitatious in both the brief on the motion to dismiss and the brief submitted by the plaintiff in error, and find that the judgment of the court fairly determinéis the law, and that the argument that the county court never obtained jurisdiction of the attempted appeal is well supported. Randol v. Harbour-Longmire Co., 127 Okla. 7, 259 P. 548.

It being apparent that no good can come from further delay in this court, and that the appeal is not meritorious, the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1933 OK 56, 18 P.2d 860, 162 Okla. 18, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-graded-school-dist-no-106-v-independent-consolidated-school-dist-okla-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack