Union Electric Construction Corp. v. Jansen Co. of Florida

450 So. 2d 919, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13512
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 1984·No. No. 83-1818·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We treat this appeal as a petition for common law certiorari. Hansen v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 408 So.2d 658 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The order in question which granted the Motion to Compel Arbitration is quashed. The cause is remanded with instructions to conduct an evidentiary hearing after notice upon the Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Jansen Company of Florida, Inc. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Melamed, 425 So.2d 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Falowski, 425 So.2d 129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

Certiorari granted.

HERSEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur. LETTS, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Electric Construction Corp. v. Jansen Co. of Florida, 450 So. 2d 919, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13512 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

450 So. 2d 919 (Union Electric Construction Corp. v. Jansen Co. of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Falowski
425 So. 2d 129 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Melamed
425 So. 2d 127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Hansen v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
408 So. 2d 658 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)