Union Dime Savings Institution v. Feltz

21 N.Y. St. Rep. 729
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1889·Published

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Union Dime Savings Inst. v. Neppert (ante p. 723), decided herewith, the judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide ■event.

Macomber, J., concurs; Brady, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Dime Savings Institution v. Feltz, 21 N.Y. St. Rep. 729 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

21 N.Y. St. Rep. 729 (Union Dime Savings Institution v. Feltz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.