Union Dime Savings Bank v. Frohlich

57 A.D.2d 862, 394 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12085
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 9, 1977·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding, inter alia, to evict a tenant, the appeal (by permission) is from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated September 22, 1976, which reversed a judgment of the District Court, Nassau County, Third District, in favor of the appellant tenants and awarded possession and a money judgment to the respondent landlord. Order affirmed, with costs. The appellant tenants were not physically expelled or excluded from the demised premises. Therefore, a partial, actual eviction had not occurred. The tenants cannot claim a constructive eviction since at no time did they abandon the premises. Hopkins, J. P., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Dime Savings Bank v. Frohlich, 57 A.D.2d 862, 394 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12085 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

57 A.D.2d 862 (Union Dime Savings Bank v. Frohlich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scolamiero v. Cincotta
128 A.D.2d 224 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
S. E. Nichols, Inc. v. American Shopping Centers, Inc.
115 A.D.2d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Bet Construction Corp. v. City of New York
96 Misc. 2d 1102 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)