Union Dime Sav. Inst. v. Feltz
4 N.Y.S. 607, 58 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 641, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1621
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Savings Inst. v. Neppert, 3 N. Y. Supp. 797, the judgment should be reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Macomber, J., concurs. Brady, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Union Dime Sav. Inst. v. Feltz, 4 N.Y.S. 607, 58 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 641, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1621 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).
4 N.Y.S. 607 (Union Dime Sav. Inst. v. Feltz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stamets v. Plano Manufacturing Co.
82 N.E. 122 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1907)