Union Creosote & Oil Co. v. Aktiengesellschaft

222 A.D. 819

This text of 222 A.D. 819 (Union Creosote & Oil Co. v. Aktiengesellschaft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Union Creosote & Oil Co. v. Aktiengesellschaft, 222 A.D. 819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Order of October 14, 1927, denying defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to accept defendants’ answer, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. We construe the order made by Mr. Justice Druhan on September 8, 1627, in which defendants were given leave to answer, as having been fully complied with by defendants in the service of their answer on October 1, 1927. (Moore & Co. v. Heymann, 207 App. Div. 416; Corporation of Scholes [820]*820v. Ficke Warehouses, Inc., 204 id. 329.) TMs disposition requires a reversal upon the law and the facts, but without costs, of the orders denying defendants’ motions to open the alleged default and to vacate the judgment entered thereon, and a granting of said motions, without costs. Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Seeger, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

George A. Moore & Co. v. Heymann
207 A.D. 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 A.D. 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-creosote-oil-co-v-aktiengesellschaft-nyappdiv-1928.