Union County v. James
This text of 21 Pa. 525 (Union County v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered, by
— Most certainly the Act of 1844 is general enough to include the- salary of a professor in a college as a subject of taxation; and we discover nothing in the law and no public policy that entitles us to Say that the legislature did not intend to include it. Starting with the principle that all persons ought to contribute to the expenses of government, we should rather presume the contrary. But it is said that the state does not tax the means of education, either secular or religious. True enough, yet it may tax those who make education their business and livelihood. This is certainly as reasonable as taxing the salaries paid by the public itself out of the taxes. The defendant is not however properly an officer of the corporation, but a person in its employment, and his salary ought to be taxed only one per cent, as for an occupation or profession: 5 W. & Ser. 275.
Judgment reversed, and judgment for plaintiff for six dollars.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Pa. 525, 1853 Pa. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-county-v-james-pa-1853.