Union County Trust Company v. Sun Chemical Corporation

Third Circuit

Union County Trust Company v. Sun Chemical Corporation

257 F.2d 810, 118 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 186, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5793

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJuly 15, 1958

Docket12592_1

StatusPublished

This text of 257 F.2d 810 (Union County Trust Company v. Sun Chemical Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Union County Trust Company v. Sun Chemical Corporation, 257 F.2d 810, 118 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 186, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5793 (3d Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action for an accounting for breach of contract resulted from a dispute between the parties as to the proper construction of a patent royalty agreement, as amended. The issue presented in the District Court was whether the defendant was obligated by the terms of the patent license agreement, as amended, to include in its royalty computation all its sales and/or rentals of photo-composing products until the expiration of the last patent listed in the original agreement or incorporated therein by subsequent amendments, irrespective of whether the last patent was American or foreign.

The District Court found in favor of the plaintiff upon admitted and stipulated facts and awarded an accounting for breach of contract.

The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the District Court correctly construed the license agreement.

Upon review of the record and after consideration of the contentions ably presented by counsel for the parties, we find no error.

The Order of the District Court, 163 F.Supp. 805, will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action for an accounting for breach of contract resulted from a dispute between the parties as to the proper construction of a patent royalty agreement, as amended. The issue presented in the District Court was whether the defendant was obligated by the terms of the patent license agreement, as amended, to include in its royalty computation all its sales and/or rentals of photo-composing products until the expiration of the last patent listed in the original agreement or incorporated therein by subsequent amendments, irrespective of whether the last patent was American or foreign.

The District Court found in favor of the plaintiff upon admitted and stipulated facts and awarded an accounting for breach of contract.

The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the District Court correctly construed the license agreement.

Upon review of the record and after consideration of the contentions ably presented by counsel for the parties, we find no error.

The Order of the District Court, 163 F.Supp. 805, will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 F.2d 810, 118 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 186, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-county-trust-company-v-sun-chemical-corporation-ca3-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack