Union County Trust Co. v. Martin

10 A.2d 650, 124 N.J.L. 35, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 226
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 25, 1940·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The appeal in this case is from an affirmance in the Supreme Court of a decree of Vice-Ordinary Buchanan affirming a transfer tax assessment, In re Voorhees, 123 N. J. Eq. 142. After a careful examination of the record and the briefs of counsel, we conclude that the determinations of the learned vice-ordinary as applied to the facts in this case are in accordance with the law of this state.

The judgment under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance —The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10.

For reversal —None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union County Trust Co. v. Martin, 10 A.2d 650, 124 N.J.L. 35, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 226 (N.J. 1940).

10 A.2d 650 (Union County Trust Co. v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fmba v. N. Hudson Reg. Fire & Rescue
775 A.2d 43 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1988
Opinion No.
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1988
Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. Atlantic City Racing Ass'n
487 A.2d 707 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985)
Safeway Trails, Inc. v. Furman
183 A.2d 788 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Morris v. Calvert
329 S.W.2d 117 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1959)
TRUSTEES OF RUTGERS COLLEGE IN NJ v. Richman
125 A.2d 10 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Behnke v. NJ Highway Authority
95 A.2d 606 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)