Union Cotton Manufactory v. Lobdell
13 Johns. 462
Opinion
The rule is invariable, that causes of action, which admit of the same plea and the same judgment, may be joined; but the converse of this proposition is not invariably true. Debt on specialty, or debt on judgment, may be joined with debt on simple contract, although they require different pleas* (1 Chit. Plead. 197. 2 Saund. 117. note 2.)
Judgment for the plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Union Cotton Manufactory v. Lobdell, 13 Johns. 462 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).
13 Johns. 462 (Union Cotton Manufactory v. Lobdell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Somerville v. Grim
17 W. Va. 803 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1881)
De Proux v. Sargent
70 Me. 266 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1879)
McNulty v. Batty
2 Pin. 53 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1847)
Norris v. School District No. 1
12 Me. 293 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1835)