Union Cotton Manufactory v. Lobdell
13 Johns. 462
This text of 13 Johns. 462 (Union Cotton Manufactory v. Lobdell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Union Cotton Manufactory v. Lobdell, 13 Johns. 462 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).
Opinion
The rule is invariable, that causes of action, which admit of the same plea and the same judgment, may be joined; but the converse of this proposition is not invariably true. Debt on specialty, or debt on judgment, may be joined with debt on simple contract, although they require different pleas* (1 Chit. Plead. 197. 2 Saund. 117. note 2.)
Judgment for the plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Somerville v. Grim
17 W. Va. 803 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1881)
De Proux v. Sargent
70 Me. 266 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1879)
McNulty v. Batty
2 Pin. 53 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1847)
Norris v. School District No. 1
12 Me. 293 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1835)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 Johns. 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-cotton-manufactory-v-lobdell-nysupct-1816.