Union Co. v. United States

46 F.2d 717, 71 Ct. Cl. 485, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 808, 1929 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 306, 1931 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9126
United States Court of Claims·Decided May 6, 1929·No. No. H-309·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case has been submitted by plaintiff on the theory that certain facts exist of which there is no evidence in the ease. There is absolutely nothing in the evidence from which the court can determine the amount of the net income, or the amount of invested capital, or the unamortized value of leaseholds during the years involved in the ease. Without this evidence it is impossible for the court [719] to determine wliat tax ought to have been assessed against the plaintiff.

The burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove the facts establishing the invalidity of the tax. United States v. Anderson, 269 U. S. 422, 443, 46 S. Ct. 131, 70 L. Ed. 347; United States v. Mitchell, 271 U. S. 9, 12, 46 S. Ct. 418, 70 L. Ed. 799. The plaintiff having failed to sustain this burden, the petition must be dismissed. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Co. v. United States, 46 F.2d 717, 71 Ct. Cl. 485, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 808, 1929 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 306, 1931 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9126 (cc 1929).

46 F.2d 717 (Union Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wiseman v. United States
259 F. Supp. 90 (D. Maine, 1966)
Bell v. Harrison. Bell v. United States
212 F.2d 253 (Seventh Circuit, 1954)
H. R. Laboratories, Inc. v. United States
55 F. Supp. 266 (S.D. New York, 1943)
Eaton v. American Chain Co.
63 F.2d 783 (Second Circuit, 1933)
Union Co. v. United States
53 F.2d 295 (Court of Claims, 1931)