Union Central Life Insurance v. Bell

92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 522
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 27, 1915
DocketNo. 13516
StatusPublished

This text of 92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 522 (Union Central Life Insurance v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Union Central Life Insurance v. Bell, 92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 522 (Ohio 1915).

Opinion

The judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one of the judges not participating) and are unable for that reason -to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of this fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the circuit court, it is ordered that defendant in error recover from plaintiff in error his costs herein expended.

Wanamaker, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Nichols, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-central-life-insurance-v-bell-ohio-1915.