Union Central Life Insurance v. Bell

Ohio Supreme Court

Union Central Life Insurance v. Bell

92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 522

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 27, 1915·No. No. 13516·Published

Opinion

The judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one of the judges not participating) and are unable for that reason -to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of this fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the circuit court, it is ordered that defendant in error recover from plaintiff in error his costs herein expended.

Wanamaker, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Nichols, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one of the judges not participating) and are unable for that reason -to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of this fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the circuit court, it is ordered that defendant in error recover from plaintiff in error his costs herein expended.

Wanamaker, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Nichols, C. J., not participating.

Union Central Life Insurance v. Bell, 92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 522 (Ohio 1915).

Pincite

92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 522 (Union Central Life Insurance v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.