Union Cartage Co. v. United States

368 U.S. 143, 82 S. Ct. 246, 7 L. Ed. 2d 188, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 62
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 4, 1961·No. No. 448·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Cartage Co. v. United States, 368 U.S. 143, 82 S. Ct. 246, 7 L. Ed. 2d 188, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 62 (1961).

368 U.S. 143 (Union Cartage Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carrier v. Pro-Tech Restoration
944 P.2d 346 (Utah Supreme Court, 1997)
State v. Velarde
734 P.2d 440 (Utah Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. O'BRIEN
721 P.2d 896 (Utah Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Allan
562 P.2d 632 (Washington Supreme Court, 1977)
Hurst v. State
519 P.2d 971 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1974)
State v. Cowan
490 P.2d 890 (Utah Supreme Court, 1971)
State v. Augustine
222 So. 2d 502 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1969)
In Re Anderson
447 P.2d 117 (California Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. James
169 So. 2d 89 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1964)
State v. Hughes
154 So. 2d 395 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1963)
Mack Merrill Rivenburgh, Jr. v. State of Utah
299 F.2d 842 (Tenth Circuit, 1962)