Union Carbide Corporation v. Rhonda Fields
This text of Union Carbide Corporation v. Rhonda Fields (Union Carbide Corporation v. Rhonda Fields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIRD DIVISION ELLINGTON, P. J. DOYLE, P. J. and MILLER J.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/
May 5, 2014
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A11A2025. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION et al v. RHONDA FIELDS et al.
MILLER, Judge.
In Georgia-Pacific, LLC v. Fields, 293 Ga. 499 (748 SE2d 407) (2013), the
Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the judgment of this Court in Division 1 (d) of
Union Carbide Corp. v. Field, 315 Ga. App. 554 (726 SE2d 521) (2012), in which
this Court affirmed the partial grant of summary judgment to Rhonda and Gary Fields
on the defense of nonparty fault as it pertained to Central Moloney, Inc., Nehring
Electrical Works Co., Phelps Dodge Cable & Wire, Southern States LLC and
Southwire Co. Consequently, we vacate Division 1 (d) of our opinion in Union
Carbide, supra, and in its place adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own. The Supreme Court did not address or consider Divisions 1 (a) - (c) or Division
1 (e) of our earlier opinion, in which we concluded that the trial court properly
granted partial summary judgment to the Fields on the defendants’ nonparty defense
as it pertained to Georgia Power Company, Ford Motor Company, Genuine Parts Co.,
Chrysler LLC, General Motors, Asbestos Corporation Ltd., Atlas Asbestos, Johnson
Mines, Nicolet Industries and Pacific Asbestos. Union Carbide, supra, 315 Ga. App.
at 557-561 (1) (a) - (c) and 563-564 (1) (e). The Supreme Court also did not address
or consider Division 2 of our earlier opinion in which we held that a factual issue
remained as to causation with regard to Mrs. Fields’s exposure to Union Carbide’s
product. Id. at 566 (2). Since those portions of our earlier opinion are consistent with
the Supreme Court’s opinion, Divisions 1 (a) - (c), Division 1 (e) and Division 2 of
our earlier opinion “become binding upon the return of the remittitur.” Shadix v.
Carroll County, 274 Ga. 560, 563 (1) (554 SE2d 465) (2001).
Accordingly, we reverse the grant of partial summary judgment to the Fieldses
on the defendants’ nonparty defense as it pertained to Central Moloney, Inc., Nehring
Electrical Works Co., Phelps Dodge Cable & Wire, Southern States LLC and
Southwire Co. We affirm the grant of partial summary judgment to the Fieldses on
the defendants’ nonparty defense as it pertained to Georgia Power Co., Ford Motor
2 Co., Genuine Parts Co., Chrysler LLC, General Motors, Asbestos Corp. Ltd., Atlas
Asbestos, Johnson Mines, Nicolet Indus. and Pacific Asbestos.
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part. Ellington, P.J., and Doyle,
P.J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Union Carbide Corporation v. Rhonda Fields, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-carbide-corporation-v-rhonda-fields-gactapp-2014.