Union Carbide Corporation v. Jack Loftin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Union Carbide Corporation v. Jack Loftin

DecidedApril 3, 2008

Docket09-08-00061-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Union Carbide Corporation v. Jack Loftin (Union Carbide Corporation v. Jack Loftin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Union Carbide Corporation v. Jack Loftin, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-08-061 CV

UNION CARBIDE, ET AL., Appellants

V.

JACK LOFTIN, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 128th District Court

Orange County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. A-070037-C; AC; BC; CC; DC; EC

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Bayer Corporation filed a motion to dismiss its appeal. Bayer Corporation is one of multiple appellants in this accelerated appeal from a series of orders denying motions to transfer venue. The motion is voluntarily made by Bayer Corporation prior to any decision of this Court and should be granted. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Other parties also filed notices of appeal. No party filed an objection to the motion to dismiss filed by Bayer Corporation. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal of Bayer Corporation is dismissed. The appeal shall continue as to all other parties that timely filed notices of appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered April 3, 2008

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-08-061 CV

UNION CARBIDE, ET AL., Appellants

V.

JACK LOFTIN, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 128th District Court

Orange County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. A-070037-C; AC; BC; CC; DC; EC

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Bayer Corporation filed a motion to dismiss its appeal. Bayer Corporation is one of multiple appellants in this accelerated appeal from a series of orders denying motions to transfer venue. The motion is voluntarily made by Bayer Corporation prior to any decision of this Court and should be granted. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Other parties also filed notices of appeal. No party filed an objection to the motion to dismiss filed by Bayer Corporation. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal of Bayer Corporation is dismissed. The appeal shall continue as to all other parties that timely filed notices of appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered April 3, 2008

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Union Carbide Corporation v. Jack Loftin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-carbide-corporation-v-jack-loftin-texapp-2008.