Union Bus Lines, Inc., and Bobby Dee Wells v. Andres Galarza, Individually and on Behalf of His Wife, Genoveva S. Galarza

369 F.2d 402, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4228
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 29, 1966·No. 23518_1·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This belated attempt by appellants to oust the jurisdiction of the Federal court by insisting that the appellee’s injured wife, a resident of the State of Texas, must be considered a party plaintiff, is based on too tenuous a reliance on the recent amendment to the Texas Married Womens Act, Art. 4618, Rev.Civil Stat.

The Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Bus Lines, Inc., and Bobby Dee Wells v. Andres Galarza, Individually and on Behalf of His Wife, Genoveva S. Galarza, 369 F.2d 402, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4228 (5th Cir. 1966).

369 F.2d 402 (Union Bus Lines, Inc., and Bobby Dee Wells v. Andres Galarza, Individually and on Behalf of His Wife, Genoveva S. Galarza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyce v. Boyce
541 A.2d 614 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
Nagle v. Commercial Credit Business Loans, Inc.
102 F.R.D. 27 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1983)
Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance
544 F. Supp. 645 (E.D. Michigan, 1982)
Fernandez-Cerra v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark
344 F. Supp. 314 (D. Puerto Rico, 1972)
Weatherford v. Elizondo
52 F.R.D. 122 (S.D. Texas, 1971)
McCormick & Co. v. Bedford Industries, Inc.
301 F. Supp. 29 (D. Maryland, 1969)