Union Bank of Louisiana v. Martin
This text of 4 Rob. 144 (Union Bank of Louisiana v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Bank appeals from a judgment, sustaining the opposition of the appellees to the homologation of a sale of property under an execution on the monition of the appellant, and setting aside the sale. The sale was set aside, on the ground that the Sheriff ought to have accepted the sureties of Iiarrolson, to whom the land had been adjudicated as the last and highest bidder, for one thousand dollars ; and that the Sheriff improperly adjudicated it to the plaintiff for two hundred dollars. The question turned on the sufficiency of the sureties offered by Harrolson, and the court thought them sufficient. Several witnesses were examined on this point, and the testimony is somewhat contradictory ; but it does not appear to us that the court erred, in concluding that it preponderated in favor of the sufficiency of the sureties.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Rob. 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-bank-of-louisiana-v-martin-la-1843.