Union Bank of Israel v. L. Blankstein & Son, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Union Bank of Israel v. L. Blankstein & Son, Inc.

93 A.D.2d 744, 460 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17580

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 93 A.D.2d 744 (Union Bank of Israel v. L. Blankstein & Son, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Union Bank of Israel v. L. Blankstein & Son, Inc., 93 A.D.2d 744, 460 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17580 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Lane, J.), entered May 18, 1982 denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment granted. The issues tendered on this appeal have previously been ruled upon by us on three separate occasions (First Int. Bank of Israel v Blankstein & Son, 88 AD2d 501; Israel Discount Bank v Rosen, 90 AD2d 740; Israel Discount Bank v S & J Blum Inc., 90 AD2d 740). On each occasion we have held adversely to the position advanced by defendant herein and have sustained the right of plaintiff to summary judgment. We follow the same course of action on this appeal. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Bloom, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Lane, J.), entered May 18, 1982 denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment granted. The issues tendered on this appeal have previously been ruled upon by us on three separate occasions (First Int. Bank of Israel v Blankstein & Son, 88 AD2d 501; Israel Discount Bank v Rosen, 90 AD2d 740; Israel Discount Bank v S & J Blum Inc., 90 AD2d 740). On each occasion we have held adversely to the position advanced by defendant herein and have sustained the right of plaintiff to summary judgment. We follow the same course of action on this appeal. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Bloom, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A.D.2d 744, 460 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-bank-of-israel-v-l-blankstein-son-inc-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack