Union Bank of Georgetown v. Magruder
24 F. Cas. 565, 2 D.C. 687, 2 Cranch 687
This text of 24 F. Cas. 565 (Union Bank of Georgetown v. Magruder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Union Bank of Georgetown v. Magruder, 24 F. Cas. 565, 2 D.C. 687, 2 Cranch 687 (circtddc 1826).
Opinion
was of opinion that no de-jnand of payment of the note was necessary upon the defendant as administrator of the maker, to charge the defendant as indorser of the note.
Reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States. 3 Peters, 87.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
George B. Magruder, in Error v. The Union Bank of Georgetown, in Error
28 U.S. 87 (Supreme Court, 1830)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 565, 2 D.C. 687, 2 Cranch 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-bank-of-georgetown-v-magruder-circtddc-1826.