Union Bank of Georgetown v. Magruder
24 F. Cas. 565, 2 D.C. 687, 2 Cranch 687
Opinion
was of opinion that no de-jnand of payment of the note was necessary upon the defendant as administrator of the maker, to charge the defendant as indorser of the note.
Reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States. 3 Peters, 87.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Union Bank of Georgetown v. Magruder, 24 F. Cas. 565, 2 D.C. 687, 2 Cranch 687 (circtddc 1826).
24 F. Cas. 565 (Union Bank of Georgetown v. Magruder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
George B. Magruder, in Error v. The Union Bank of Georgetown, in Error
28 U.S. 87 (Supreme Court, 1830)