Union Bank of Georgetown v. Gozler
24 F. Cas. 564, 2 D.C. 349, 2 Cranch 349
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedOctober 15, 1822
StatusPublished
This text of 24 F. Cas. 564 (Union Bank of Georgetown v. Gozler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Union Bank of Georgetown v. Gozler, 24 F. Cas. 564, 2 D.C. 349, 2 Cranch 349 (circtddc 1822).
Opinion
decided without argument, that it was not usury to take by way of discount, interest for sixty-four days on the amount of the note; the point having been before decided both here and in Alexandria. See Bank of Alexandria v. Mandeville, at Alexandria, July, 1809, [1 Craneh, C. C. 552;] Bank of Washington v. Eliot, (not reported.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 564, 2 D.C. 349, 2 Cranch 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-bank-of-georgetown-v-gozler-circtddc-1822.