Union Bank of Georgetown v. Crittenden
24 F. Cas. 558, 2 D.C. 238, 2 Cranch 238
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided April 15, 1821·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
(nem. con.) having taken time to consider, quashed the execution, set aside the judgment, and reinstated the cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Union Bank of Georgetown v. Crittenden, 24 F. Cas. 558, 2 D.C. 238, 2 Cranch 238 (circtddc 1821).
24 F. Cas. 558 (Union Bank of Georgetown v. Crittenden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baretich v. United States
97 F. Supp. 600 (S.D. New York, 1951)
Nashua Savings Bank v. Anglo-American Land-Mortgage & Agency Co.
108 F. 764 (First Circuit, 1901)
Glass v. Glass
76 Ala. 368 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)
Gay v. Joplin
13 F. 650 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri, 1882)
Hutchins v. Gerrish
52 N.H. 205 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1872)
Adams v. Way
33 Conn. 419 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1866)
Pickard v. Bailey
26 N.H. 152 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1852)
Phillips v. Gregg
10 Watts 158 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1840)
Mahurin v. Bickford
6 N.H. 567 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1834)
Andrews v. Herriot
4 Cow. 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Woolsey v. Paulding
7 Mart. 280 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1821)