Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia/Union Bane v. Cook & Clare

Union Bane v. Cook & Clare

24 F. Cas. 549, 2 D.C. 218, 2 Cranch 218
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedNovember 15, 1820
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 F. Cas. 549 (Union Bane v. Cook & Clare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Union Bane v. Cook & Clare, 24 F. Cas. 549, 2 D.C. 218, 2 Cranch 218 (circtddc 1820).

Opinion

But

the Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

was of opinion that the alteration, prolonging the time of payment, being for the benefit of the defendants, did not make the note void as to them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Styles v. Theo. P. Scotland & Co.
134 N.W. 708 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 549, 2 D.C. 218, 2 Cranch 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-bane-v-cook-clare-circtddc-1820.