Union Bane v. Cook & Clare

24 F. Cas. 549, 2 D.C. 218, 2 Cranch 218
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided November 15, 1820·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

But

the Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

was of opinion that the alteration, prolonging the time of payment, being for the benefit of the defendants, did not make the note void as to them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Bane v. Cook & Clare, 24 F. Cas. 549, 2 D.C. 218, 2 Cranch 218 (circtddc 1820).

24 F. Cas. 549 (Union Bane v. Cook & Clare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Styles v. Theo. P. Scotland & Co.
134 N.W. 708 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1912)