Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

420 F. App'x 992
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 632 F.3d 1292
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 16, 2011·No. Nos. 2010-1035, 2010-1055·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by Plaintiffs-Appellants, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Defendant-Cross Appellant. The court granted leave to file a brief amici curiae to ten damages experts, all appearing pro se.

The petition for panel rehearing was considered by the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, response, and brief amici curiae were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll of whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The petition of Plaintiffs-Appellants for panel rehearing is denied.

(2) The petition of Plaintiffs-Appellants for rehearing en banc is denied.

(3) The mandate of the court will issue on May 23, 2011.

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge, dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 420 F. App'x 992 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

420 F. App'x 992 (Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.