Unifund CCR, LLC v. Santiago

Missouri Court of Appeals

Unifund CCR, LLC v. Santiago

449 S.W.3d 828, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1399, 2014 WL 7171813

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 2014·No. No. ED 101227·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant/Defendant Rickey Santiago (“Santiago”) appeals from a default judgment entered against him by the trial court for an unpaid credit card account with Respondent Unifund CCR, LLC (“Unifund”), and from the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside that judgment for want of service. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[829] The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant/Defendant Rickey Santiago (“Santiago”) appeals from a default judgment entered against him by the trial court for an unpaid credit card account with Respondent Unifund CCR, LLC (“Unifund”), and from the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside that judgment for want of service. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[829] The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Unifund CCR, LLC v. Santiago, 449 S.W.3d 828, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1399, 2014 WL 7171813 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

449 S.W.3d 828 (Unifund CCR, LLC v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.