Uniform District Court Rules

CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 19, 2008
Docket07-0110
StatusPublished

This text of Uniform District Court Rules (Uniform District Court Rules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Uniform District Court Rules, (Mo. 2008).

Opinion

March 19 2008

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

AF 07-0110 ______________

IN RE THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS ) TO THE MONTANA UNIFORM ) ORDER DISTRICT COURT RULES ) ______________

On June 19, 2003, this Court ordered the Commission on Uniform District Court Rules to meet and address the question of trial court delay. On June 1, 2005, the Commission, acting through its chairperson, Mr. John Grant, submitted proposed changes to the Uniform District Court Rules for the Court’s consideration. On May 22, 2007, this Court ordered that the Uniform District Court Rules Commission meet with the District Court Council to discuss the need for, and particulars of, any proposed changes to the Uniform District Court Rules. On July 30, 2007, Mr. Grant advised the Court that the Uniform District Court Rules Commission and the District Court Council had met and that the Commission had unanimously voted to resubmit the proposed rule changes for the Court’s consideration. On November 13, 2007, the Court published the proposed rule changes and provided a ninety-day comment period. As of February 13, 2008, the comment period had expired, and all written comments were on file with the Clerk of the Montana Supreme Court. On Tuesday, March 11, 2008, the matter was set for public hearing before the Montana Supreme Court. At said hearing, the Court reviewed the objections and inquired as to whether any persons in attendance had any further comments or suggestions. There were no further comments. Most all of the filed comments stated that, unless the District Courts were given further resources, including additional judges, the courts were not in a position to comply with the suggested time constraints set forth in proposed Rules 3, 11 and 12. It was also noted that those new rules are premature until such time as the District Court performance standards are completed and until the 2009 Legislative Session has had an opportunity to address any requests for additional resources for the District Courts.

1 Having reviewed the proposed amendments to the Uniform District Court Rules and the comments submitted thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The proposed amendments to Rules 1, 2, 4 and 5 are hereby adopted. 2. Adoption of proposed new Rules 3, 11 and 12 is hereby rejected without prejudice to submission at a later date. 3. The Uniform District Court Rules, as amended hereby and attached to this Order, shall become effective on June 1, 2008. 4. The Court thanks the Commission on Uniform District Court Rules for its hard work and perseverance in addressing the difficult and contentious subject of delay. DATED this 19th day of March, 2008.

/S/ KARLA M. GRAY /S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART /S/ JAMES C. NELSON /S/ PATRICIA COTTER /S/ JOHN WARNER /S/ BRIAN MORRIS /S/ JIM RICE

2 UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES

Effective June 1, 2008

Rule 1. Form of papers presented for filing. (a) Papers defined. The word “papers” as used in this rule includes all documents and copies except exhibits and records on appeal from lower courts. (b) Pagination, printing, etc. All papers shall be: (1) typewritten, printed, or equivalent; (2) clear and permanent; (3) equally legible to printing; (4) of type not smaller than pica; (5) only on standard quality opaque, unglazed, acid-free recycled paper, and be a minimum of 25% cotton fiber content, minimum 50% recycled content, of which 10% shall be post-consumer waste, 8½” X 11” in size. (6) printed one side only; except copies of briefs may be printed on both sides. The original brief shall be printed on one side. (7) lines unnumbered or numbered consecutively from the top; (8) spaced one and one-half or double; (9) page numbered consecutively at the bottom; and (10) bound firmly at the top. Matters such as property descriptions or direct quotes may be single spaced. Extraneous documents not in the above format and not readily conformable may be filed in their original form and length. (c) Format. The first page of all papers shall conform to the following: (1) Commencing at line 1 at the left margin, single spaced, shall be the name of the attorney or party responsible for the pleadings, together with telephone number and the complete mailing address for service of papers. (2) Lines 1 through 7 of the right one-half of the page shall be left blank for the use of the clerk. (3) On or below line 8, the title of the court. (4) Commencing at line 9 or below on the left, the title of the case. (5) On the right and opposite the title of the case, the case number and identification of the document being filed. (6) Nonconforming papers may not be filed without leave of the court. (d) Changes, conformance of copies. Additions, deletions, or interlineations shall be initialed by the clerk or judge at the time of filing. All copies served shall conform to the original as filed.

Rule 2. Motions. (a) Upon filing a motion or within five days thereafter, the moving party shall file a brief. The brief may be accompanied by appropriate supporting documents. Within ten days thereafter

3 the adverse party shall file an answer brief which also may be accompanied by appropriate supporting documents. Within ten days thereafter, movant may file a reply brief or other appropriate responsive documents. (b) Failure to file briefs. Failure to file briefs may subject the motion to summary ruling. Failure to file a brief within five days by the moving party shall be deemed an admission that the motion is without merit. Failure to file an answer brief by the adverse party within ten days shall be deemed an admission that the motion is well taken. Reply briefs by movant are optional, and failure to file will not subject a motion to summary ruling. (c) Oral argument. The court may order oral argument sua sponte or upon application of a party. (d) When motion deemed submitted. Unless oral argument is ordered or unless the time is enlarged by the court, the motion is deemed submitted at the expiration of any of the applicable time limits set forth above without supporting briefs having been filed. If oral argument is ordered, the motion will be deemed submitted at the close of argument unless the court orders additional briefs, in which case the motion will be deemed submitted as of the date designated as the time for filing the final brief. (e) In the event of conflict, the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure shall control. Time computation shall be governed by Rule 6, M.R.Civ.P.

Rule 3. Ex parte matters. (a) Extensions of time to further plead, file briefs, continue a hearing on a motion and other permissible ex parte matters, may be granted by order of the court upon written application. (b) Prior to the issuance of an ex parte order, the attorney seeking such order must file a written certification with the court declaring that opposing counsel has been contacted and given reasonable notice of: (1) the time and place of the ex parte conference or meeting; (2) the substance of the order sought; (3) whether counsel opposes the motion. (c) All requests for extension of time or continuance or other ex parte matters shall be accompanied by an appropriate form or order, with sufficient copies for the clerk to mail to adverse parties. (d) Except as otherwise provided by these rules or statute, no document, including briefs, proposed orders and proposed judgments, may be presented to the court at any time unless it is first filed with the court and served on all opposing counsel.

4 Rule 4. Filing of discovery. (a) Depositions upon oral or written examinations, interrogatories and answers thereto, requests for production of documents and responses thereto, requests for admissions and responses thereto, shall not be routinely filed. When any motion is filed making reference to discovery, the party filing the motion shall submit with the motion relevant unfiled documents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Uniform District Court Rules, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uniform-district-court-rules-mont-2008.