Unicorn Star, Inc. v. La Corrida Restaurante, Inc.

591 So. 2d 271, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10697, 1991 WL 205848
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1991·No. No. 91-1017·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LETTS, Judge.

The sale of a restaurant operation1 allegedly fell through because the purchaser defaulted. The trial court granted a prejudgment writ of replevin under section 78.068, Florida Statutes (1989), but waived the requirement of a bond. We reverse.

[272]*272The above quoted Florida Statute is crystal clear. Under subsection (3), the petitioner must post a bond in accordance with the statutory terms. Zuckerman v. Professional Writers of Florida, Inc., 398 So.2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), rev. denied, 411 So.2d 385 (Fla.1981).2

We find no merit in the second point on appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unicorn Star, Inc. v. La Corrida Restaurante, Inc., 591 So. 2d 271, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10697, 1991 WL 205848 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

591 So. 2d 271 (Unicorn Star, Inc. v. La Corrida Restaurante, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Future Tech International, Inc. v. Tae Il Media, Ltd.
944 F. Supp. 1538 (S.D. Florida, 1996)