Uniack v. Merchants Union Ice Co.
This text of 162 A.D. 895 (Uniack v. Merchants Union Ice Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no evidence to support the finding that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence, and the motion to dismiss the complaint made on the trial should have been granted. The judgment is, therefore, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., and Laughlin, J., dissented and voted for affirmance. Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 A.D. 895, 146 N.Y.S. 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uniack-v-merchants-union-ice-co-nyappdiv-1914.