Uni-Serv Corp. v. Frede

53 Misc. 2d 644, 279 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1690
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 16, 1967·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm on the ground that plaintiff has failed to establish the existence of the contract on which it sued. We reach no other issue.

The judgment should be affirmed, with $25 costs.

Concur — Hecht, Jr., J. P., Gold and Hopstadter, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uni-Serv Corp. v. Frede, 53 Misc. 2d 644, 279 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

53 Misc. 2d 644 (Uni-Serv Corp. v. Frede) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oscar S. Gray v. American Express Company
743 F.2d 10 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Engel v. Lichterman
95 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Skandia America Reinsurance Corp. v. Schenck
441 F. Supp. 715 (S.D. New York, 1977)
Allen & Company v. Occidental Petroleum Corporation
382 F. Supp. 1052 (S.D. New York, 1974)