Ungerleider v. Butler

280 A.D. 999, 117 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4540
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 24, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 A.D. 999 (Ungerleider v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ungerleider v. Butler, 280 A.D. 999, 117 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

On January 23,1933, a money judgment was obtained against the judgment debtor. On February 18, 1944, the judgment debtor became the owner of an undivided one-sixth interest in certain real property in Kings County by inheritance. On June 21,1950, execution was issued. Pursuant to section 512 of the Civil Practice [1000]*1000Act, a levy was made on all the right, title, and interest of the judgment debtor in the real property. That interest was sold on January 22, 1951. In May, 1952, the judgment debtor moved to vacate the levy on the grounds that (1) the levy did not describe the interest of the judgment debtor as that of an heir or devisee; (2) the levy did not describe the interest of the judgment debtor as being that of an undivided one-sixth interest. The motion to vacate the levy was denied because (a) the notice must state that the property levied on is that of an heir or devisee only when the levy is made on property of an heir or devisee of the judgment debtor and not when the property levied on is that of the judgment debtor himself, even though he acquired the property by inheritance; (b) it is not necessary to specify the exact interest of the judgment debtor in the property in the notice of levy. The judgment debtor appeals from the order denying his motion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levine v. Bornstein
4 A.D.2d 55 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D. 999, 117 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ungerleider-v-butler-nyappdiv-1952.