Unger v. Village of Falconer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Unger v. Village of Falconer

1 A.D.2d 930, 150 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6133

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 930 (Unger v. Village of Falconer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Unger v. Village of Falconer, 1 A.D.2d 930, 150 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, amended judgment, and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Williams, J., who concurs as to the National Worsted Mills of Falconer, but dissents as to the judgment .against the Village of Falconer and votes for reversal and dismissal of the complaint as to such defendant on the ground that no preliminary notice was given in accordance with the statute [931]*931and that such failure was not waived by the Village of Falconer. (Appeals from a judgment, and amended judgment, of Chautauqua Trial Term for plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of negligent maintenance of village dump. The amended judgment contained a further provision that defendant village should not have judgment over against defendant Worsted Mills for any amount which it was required to pay under the judgment. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Wheeler and Williams, JJ. [See 2 A D 2d 650.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, amended judgment, and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Williams, J., who concurs as to the National Worsted Mills of Falconer, but dissents as to the judgment .against the Village of Falconer and votes for reversal and dismissal of the complaint as to such defendant on the ground that no preliminary notice was given in accordance with the statute [931]*931and that such failure was not waived by the Village of Falconer. (Appeals from a judgment, and amended judgment, of Chautauqua Trial Term for plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of negligent maintenance of village dump. The amended judgment contained a further provision that defendant village should not have judgment over against defendant Worsted Mills for any amount which it was required to pay under the judgment. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Wheeler and Williams, JJ. [See 2 A D 2d 650.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 930, 150 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unger-v-village-of-falconer-nyappdiv-1956.