Unger v. Roper

California Supreme Court

Unger v. Roper

53 Cal. 39

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1878

DocketNo. 4014

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 53 Cal. 39 (Unger v. Roper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Unger v. Roper, 53 Cal. 39 (Cal. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court :

There certainly was evidence tending to show that defendant was in the adverse possession continuously of the premises in controversy, for more than five years from May, 1862. The judgment-roll in the forcible-entry case was admissible, as tending to show that such adverse possession continued at least until July, 1867.

Appeal from judgment dismissed, and order denying new trial affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

There certainly was evidence tending to show that defendant was in the adverse possession continuously of the premises in controversy, for more than five years from May, 1862. The judgment-roll in the forcible-entry case was admissible, as tending to show that such adverse possession continued at least until July, 1867.

Appeal from judgment dismissed, and order denying new trial affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 Cal. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unger-v-roper-cal-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack