Unger v. Republic Battery Sales Co.
This text of 283 A.D. 742 (Unger v. Republic Battery Sales Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order denying motion for resettlement of the ease on appeal so as to reproduce therein as part of the printed record plaintiffs’ Exhibit 2, consisting of the records of a city hospital, reversed, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. Because of the material nature of this exhibit in conjunction with the claim of excessiveness and of the substantial printed record and the comparatively small cost of the additional reproduction, the application should have been granted. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Murphy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 742, 127 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unger-v-republic-battery-sales-co-nyappdiv-1954.