Unger v. Pascal
214 A.D.2d 431, 625 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4380
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 18, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered March 30, 1994, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and (7), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The action is not barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel since the prior fee dispute and the current legal malpractice claim involve different issues (cf., Chisholm-Ryder Co. v Sommer & Sommer, 78 AD2d 143). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Unger v. Pascal, 214 A.D.2d 431, 625 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).
214 A.D.2d 431 (Unger v. Pascal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thruway Investments v. O'Connell & Aronowitz
3 A.D.3d 674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)