Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Unger v. Pascal

Unger v. Pascal

214 A.D.2d 431, 625 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4380
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 18, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 A.D.2d 431 (Unger v. Pascal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Unger v. Pascal, 214 A.D.2d 431, 625 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered March 30, 1994, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and (7), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The action is not barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel since the prior fee dispute and the current legal malpractice claim involve different issues (cf., Chisholm-Ryder Co. v Sommer & Sommer, 78 AD2d 143). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thruway Investments v. O'Connell & Aronowitz
3 A.D.3d 674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 A.D.2d 431, 625 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unger-v-pascal-nyappdiv-1995.