Unger v. Pankuch
82 A. 874, 82 N.J.L. 750, 53 Vroom 750, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 303
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—-The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 14.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Unger v. Pankuch, 82 A. 874, 82 N.J.L. 750, 53 Vroom 750, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 303 (N.J. 1912).
82 A. 874 (Unger v. Pankuch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.