Unger v. Pankuch

82 A. 874, 82 N.J.L. 750, 53 Vroom 750, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 303
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 4, 1912·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—-The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 14.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unger v. Pankuch, 82 A. 874, 82 N.J.L. 750, 53 Vroom 750, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 303 (N.J. 1912).

82 A. 874 (Unger v. Pankuch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.