Unger v. Pankuch
82 A. 874, 82 N.J.L. 750, 53 Vroom 750, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 303
This text of 82 A. 874 (Unger v. Pankuch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Unger v. Pankuch, 82 A. 874, 82 N.J.L. 750, 53 Vroom 750, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 303 (N.J. 1912).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—-The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 14.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
82 A. 874, 82 N.J.L. 750, 53 Vroom 750, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unger-v-pankuch-nj-1912.