Unger v. Ohio State Dental Board

49 N.E.2d 932, 142 Ohio St. 67, 142 Ohio St. (N.S.) 67, 26 Ohio Op. 256, 1943 Ohio LEXIS 333
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 7, 1943·No. 29259·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

*70 By the Court.

While this court does not weigh evidence, it will examine the record to ascertain whether there is competent evidence to support the judgment of the court below. 2 Ohio Jurisprudence, 739, Section 658.

That has been done in the present case and a majority of the court is of the opinion that sufficient competent evidence was introduced against the accused to support - the judgment of the lower court.

Wherefore, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Zimmerman and Turner, JJ., concur. Hart and Bell, JJ., dissent. Williams, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unger v. Ohio State Dental Board, 49 N.E.2d 932, 142 Ohio St. 67, 142 Ohio St. (N.S.) 67, 26 Ohio Op. 256, 1943 Ohio LEXIS 333 (Ohio 1943).

49 N.E.2d 932 (Unger v. Ohio State Dental Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lies v. Ohio Veterinary Medical Board
441 N.E.2d 584 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1981)
Illinois Hospital & Health Service, Inc. v. Aurand
373 N.E.2d 1021 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1978)