Unger v. Meisenzahl

249 A.D. 707, 292 N.Y.S. 704, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5544

This text of 249 A.D. 707 (Unger v. Meisenzahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Unger v. Meisenzahl, 249 A.D. 707, 292 N.Y.S. 704, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5544 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Regardless of the question whether or not Hess would have been a competent witness had he been released from any possible liability to Meisenzahl, there is no competent proof of such release. (See Ward v. N. Y. Life Ins. Co. 225 N. Y. 314, at p. 321.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action by assignee to recover on a bond and mortgage.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thojnpson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ward v. New York Life Insurance
122 N.E. 207 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D. 707, 292 N.Y.S. 704, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unger-v-meisenzahl-nyappdiv-1936.