Unger v. Meisenzahl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Unger v. Meisenzahl

249 A.D. 707, 292 N.Y.S. 704, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5544

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 11, 1936·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Regardless of the question whether or not Hess would have been a competent witness had he been released from any possible liability to Meisenzahl, there is no competent proof of such release. (See Ward v. N. Y. Life Ins. Co. 225 N. Y. 314, at p. 321.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action by assignee to recover on a bond and mortgage.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thojnpson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Regardless of the question whether or not Hess would have been a competent witness had he been released from any possible liability to Meisenzahl, there is no competent proof of such release. (See Ward v. N. Y. Life Ins. Co. 225 N. Y. 314, at p. 321.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action by assignee to recover on a bond and mortgage.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thojnpson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Unger v. Meisenzahl, 249 A.D. 707, 292 N.Y.S. 704, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5544 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

249 A.D. 707 (Unger v. Meisenzahl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related