Unger v. Eagle Fish Co.
269 A.D. 950, 58 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4716
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 269 A.D. 950 (Unger v. Eagle Fish Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Unger v. Eagle Fish Co., 269 A.D. 950, 58 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
Opinion
Action to recover damages for fraud. Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it is insufficient in law, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur. [185 Misc. 134.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hoard v. U. S. Paint, Lacquer & Chemical Co.
44 Misc. 2d 72 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Kushilewsky v. Linchner
36 Misc. 2d 1079 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 950, 58 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unger-v-eagle-fish-co-nyappdiv-1945.