Ungar v. Sarafite

189 N.E.2d 629, 12 N.Y.2d 1013
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 28, 1963
StatusPublished

This text of 189 N.E.2d 629 (Ungar v. Sarafite) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ungar v. Sarafite, 189 N.E.2d 629, 12 N.Y.2d 1013 (N.Y. 1963).

Opinion

In the first above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs. (See Matter of Ungar, decided herewith.) No opinion.

In the second above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs. However, we point out that where the alleged contempt consists of the making of charges of wrongdoing by the Trial Judge himself he should, where disposition of the contempt charge can be withheld until after the trial and where it is otherwise practicable, order the contempt proceeding to be tried before a different Judge. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke, Foster and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis concurs in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 N.E.2d 629, 12 N.Y.2d 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ungar-v-sarafite-ny-1963.