Ungar v. Fischoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ungar v. Fischoff

38 A.D.2d 700, 328 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5520

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 A.D.2d 700 (Ungar v. Fischoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ungar v. Fischoff, 38 A.D.2d 700, 328 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 13, 1971, and orders, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 30, 1971 (a) denying cross motion to vacate receivership and (b) denying vacation of receivership and judgment of injunction, unanimously dismissed as nonappealable, moot and academic, without costs and without disbursements. Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 30, 1971, denying motion to [701]*701direct receiver to maintain status quo, unanimously affirmed. Respondent Isaías shall recover of appellants $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal. These protracted proceedings would best be terminated and the interest of the parties better served by the forthwith completion of the matter at Trial Term rather than by continued appeals. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 13, 1971, and orders, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 30, 1971 (a) denying cross motion to vacate receivership and (b) denying vacation of receivership and judgment of injunction, unanimously dismissed as nonappealable, moot and academic, without costs and without disbursements. Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 30, 1971, denying motion to [701]*701direct receiver to maintain status quo, unanimously affirmed. Respondent Isaías shall recover of appellants $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal. These protracted proceedings would best be terminated and the interest of the parties better served by the forthwith completion of the matter at Trial Term rather than by continued appeals. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 700, 328 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ungar-v-fischoff-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack