Unexcelled Laundry System, Inc. v. Esemann

248 A.D. 610
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment in an action to restrain defendant from engaging in the laundry business in Queens and Nassau counties until May 26, 1937, and from soliciting plaintiff’s customers reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. In the absence of proof of mutual mistake of the parties, or mistake on plaintiff’s part and fraud on the part of defendant, the release executed and delivered by plaintiff to defendant bars plaintiff’s right to recover. (Kirchner v. N. H. S. M. Co., 135 N. Y. 182.) The appeal from the decision is dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unexcelled Laundry System, Inc. v. Esemann, 248 A.D. 610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 610 (Unexcelled Laundry System, Inc. v. Esemann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chicken Delight Eastern, Inc. v. Wenke
27 A.D.2d 537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)