Underwriters Insurance Company v. William Groner
314 F.2d 338, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5863
Opinion
It appearing that the trial was conducted by both parties on the assumption that a hurricane occurred on the night that the insured house was destroyed, we conclude that there was sufficient evidence submitted to the jury to warrant its finding that the damage was occasioned by windstorm and not from an excepted cause. We likewise conclude that the question of fraud was one for the jury, and that the fraud issue was adequately presented to the jury by the court’s charge.
The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Underwriters Insurance Company v. William Groner, 314 F.2d 338, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5863 (5th Cir. 1963).
314 F.2d 338 (Underwriters Insurance Company v. William Groner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Groner v. Underwriters Insurance Co.
179 So. 2d 123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)